Energy Conservation

As energy costs continue to rise, knowledge of energy efficient technologies and best practices are becoming more valuable. While these practices have slowly gained acceptance within the water and wastewater industries, increasingly strained budgets coupled with aging infrastructure make energy efficiency a feasible option to save money. Through desire and innovation, our staff has kept the Authority on the cutting edge of energy efficient technologies. As eluded to in the history page of this website the Authority, for the most part, pioneered microturbine technology utilizing anaerobic digester off-gases. In fact, its pilot program was the first of its kind to be successful in North America. That 30 KW digester gas-fired microturbine generator provided the Authority with yet another opportunity to apply current technology with exceptional pay back that proved to further reduce its increasing energy demands.

Upon completion of the Anaerobic Digestion Complex Refurbishment and Upgrade Project in the spring of 2007, the production of digester gases not only increased significantly, but their rate of generation was more stable and easier to predict. During 2008 it became apparent that the Authority should move from the microturbine Pilot Scale generation of electricity to Full Scale, as such a Co-Generation Project Technology Evaluation was undertaken.
Our evaluation focused on microturbine and internal combustion engine technologies. Equipment manufacturers of the above-referenced technologies were provided with current operating data which defined annual digester gas production and digester gas properties. They were requested to select the size and quantity of their equipment with the ultimate goal of providing the maximum annual electrical energy and heat production as a function of available digester gas. Other pertinent data required to be provided by the equipment manufacturers included expected emission rates, the capital cost of equipment including gas conditioning systems, noise, delivery time, and description of proposed factory protection plan and associated cost of the plan.

Once all information was received from the equipment manufacturers, staff and consultants proceeded to conduct life cycle analyses for each of the responses received in the effort to identify the most cost-effective technology for the Authority’s co-generation project. The life cycle analyses considered equipment capital cost, potential rebate amount, annual electrical and natural gas energy savings, and cost of the factory protection plan. The present value of all costs, rebate amount and energy savings was calculated over a nine 9 year timeframe (duration of a standard factory protection plan) at an interest rate of 3%. The technology has the highest net present value was deemed to be the most cost-effective technology. Non-cost factors were also considered in the overall technical evaluation which included the amount of excess gas required to be flared via the waste gas burners, emission rates, and noise. All pertinent data had been compiled and summarized in an “Evaluation Summary- Microturbines verses Internal Combustion Engines”.

As a result of that analysis, the internal combustion engines proposed by Senergie (2 units at 140 kW each) exhibited the highest present value and therefore were deemed to be the most cost-effective technology for the Authority’s co-generation project. In addition, the proposed combined heat and power co-generation system proposed by Senergie utilizes all available digester gas for the production of electrical and heat energy and therefore will not require flaring of excess digester gas, satisfies the allowable emission rates, and easily met established noise criteria of 70dB (A) at a distance of 1 meter (3.3 feet) from the equipment. In fact at the assumed property line of the Authority (a distance of 25 feet from the co-generation equipment), the noise level at this distance reduces to 52 dB(A) which is equivalent to the noise produced by a window air conditioner unit.

Based upon the recommendation of staff the Authority once again decided to move forward with a significant capital investment in an effort to reduce its dependency on third-party energy providers, reduce its carbon footprint, and moreover insulate its User-base form upward spiraling and out of Authority control increases in energy cost.
By the spring of 2010, the project had been designed, publically bid, constructed. The system underwent start-up operations during February and was officially placed into service on March 1, 2010. The table below clearly demonstrates the effectiveness of the project.

POWERPOWER
TOTALPURCHASEDGENERATEDOFFSET OFMONTHLY
KW-HRSFROM JCP&LBY SMRSA3RDCOST
DEMANDKW-HRSKW-HRSDEPENDENCYSAVINGS
2012
JAN234,611153,167  81,44434.71%12,217
FEB197,550120,183  77,36739.16%11,605
MAR208,303101,983106,32051.04%15,948
APRIL204,157102,411101,74649.84%15,262
MAY239,647122,310117,33748.96%17,601
JUNE202,976  98,646104,33051.40%15,650
JULY188,894107,703  81,19142.98%12,179
AUG196,160127,417  68,74335.04%  9,624
SEPT158,038104,110  53,92834.12%  6,471
OCT186,397  88,647  97,75052.44%11,730
NOV200,044131,216  68,82834.41%  8,259
DEC221,682124,167  97,51543.99%10,727
2013
JAN235,250146,289  88,96137.82%  9,786
FEB187,291129,746  57,54530.72%  6,330
MAR193,579136,861  56.71829.30%  6,239
APRIL194,282113,464  80,81841.60%  9,698
MAY215,240  99,169116,07153.93%13,929
JUNE  93,726  97,542  -3,816 -4.07%   -458
JULY235,566126,304109,26246.38%12,019
AUG208,885103,586105,29950.41%11,583
SEPT217,799105,980111,81951.34%11,182
OCT203,993  99,800104,19351.08%12,503
NOV205,679109,117  96,56246.95%N/A
DEC218,573132,311  86,26239.47%  9,489
2014
JAN217,992123,642  94,35043.28%10,379
FEB204,030134,525  69,50534.07%  7,646
MAR166,126  88,532  77,59446.71%  4,656
APRIL190,896124,294  66,60234.89%  7,326
MAY203,729  81,441122,28860.02%14,675
JUNE200,369  68,427131,94265.85%15,833
JULY212,253  66,629145,62468.61%17,475
AUG213,883  78,758135,12563.18%16,215
SEPT191,964  79,542112,42258.56%14,615
OCT190,183  84,847105,33655.39%12,640
NOV199,351  96,559102,79251.56%12,335
DEC220,213132,704  87,50939.74%  9,626
2015
JAN224,126135,481  88,64539.55%  9,751
FEB202,760132,655  70,10534.58%  7,712
MAR214,362134,142  80,22037.42%  8,824
APRIL189,225  79,958109,26757.74%13,112
MAY200,945  69,516131,42965.41%15,771
JUNE206,492  73,171133,32164.56%15,999
JULY218,512  75,547142,96565.43%17,156
AUG217,258  80,308136,95063.04%16,434
SEPT205,616109,789  95,82746.60%11,499
OCT198,509  96,675101,83451.30%12,220
NOV192,966  94,638  98,32850.96%12,783
DEC194,008  74,725119,28361.48%14,314
2016
JAN196,423  93,342103,08152.48%12,370
FEB210,741120,461  90,28042.84%10,834
MAR181,639  82,774  98,86554.43%11,864
APRIL184,985  77,111107,87458.31%12,945
MAY187,080  68,942118,13863.15%15,358
JUNE202,083  68,171133,91266.27%17,409
JULY217,754  82,865134,88961.95%17,226
AUG227,011110,027116,98451.53%14,269
SEPT216,854  93,808123,04656.74%15,148
OCT203,846  84,281119,56558.65%14,846
NOV190,853  88,147102,70653.81%12,854
DEC217,743102,156115,58753.08%14,127
2017
JAN209,843  98,658111,18552.98%14,127
FEB201,118112,474  88,64444.08%11,285
MAR181,290  78,167103,12356.88%14,324
APRIL147,702  41,424106,27871.95%16,292
MAY208,347  92,231116,11655.73%15,219
JUNE223,457135,217  88,24039.49%10,693
JULY211,425120,885  90,54042.82%11,086
AUG227,441106,517120,92453.17%14,832
SEPT209,855100,941108,91451.90%11,296
OCT219,710110,521100,18947.55%10,235
NOV224,896131,106  93,79041.70%  9,540
DEC232,274131,463100.81143.40%10,324
2018
JAN234,788135,215  99.57342.41%10,013
FEB186,526  88,697  97,82952.45%10,199
MAR182,375  85,445  96,93053.15%  9,507
APRIL190,739102,911  87,82846.05%  9,124
MAY207,368116,029  91,33944.05%  9,415
JUNE212,506  94,980117,52655.30%13,180
JULY216,201  89,088127,11358.79%14,401
AUG232,650112,412120,23851.68%15,204
SEPT208,222113,496  94,72645.49%10,081
OCT187,431118,337  69,09436.86%  7,262
NOV217,652172,669  44,98320.67%  4,489
DEC208,532208,53200.00%0
2019
JAN206,762184,355  22,40710.84%  2,216
FEB160,450  80,192  80,25850.02%  8,457
MAR158,483  54,452104,03165.64%11,774
APRIL159,753  43,073116,68073.04%14,084
MAY210,616  82,144128,47261.00%14,668
JUNE204,078136,431  67,64733.15%  7,168
JULY215,465  84,257131,20860.90%15,413
AUG232,003103,332128,67155.46%14,519
SEPT224,122  82,597141,52563.15%15,988
OCT271,361114,566156,79557.78%16,559
NOV
DEC
JAN

 

The Authority remains firmly committed to its energy conservation program, and has put in place the following Best Management Practices to ensure it’s continued efforts into the future:

* Benchmark it’s energy consumption to that of other similar facilities.

*Performed continued assessments to identify best practices to save energy.

* Established a capital improvement program to generate funds to implement energy-efficiency projects.

* Appointed an energy advocate among facility staff to champion energy-efficiency projects.

* Instituted a program to continuously monitor, review and assess energy consumption on a monthly and yearly basis.

* Developed and maintained communications with management to increase awareness of the value of energy management.